The term "literature review" is frequently used to describe things that are actually different. E.g., the literature review section of a paper on a specific study is very different than a systematic review of a given topic.
Literature Review as Part | Literature Review as Whole |
|
|
The following Scholarly Snippets webinar elaborates further on this concept, as well as literature reviews in medicine and a brief overview of common types of literature reviews.
The problem-gap-hook method is a useful way to articulate the problem, identify a gap in the research, and create a hook for the audience.1,2
Watch the entire video for some additional tips to facilitate your writing process.Use Grammarly Premium to check your grammar before asking someone to review your manuscript, poster, and/or presentation. Follow the instructions in the guide linked below to create your Grammarly Premium account.
Many research articles utilize this format, as outlined in Designing Science Presentations:
Additional information on a research paper and the different sections:
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommends that authorship be based on all of the following criteria:
Those who do not meet all four criteria should be identified in the acknowledgments section.
Each author should also be able to describe their contributions (see other tab).
CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) can be used to represent common author contributions. Here is an example from an article in PLOS One (contribution types are explained below):
Consider using this website and spreadsheet to help with author order and contributions:
Contributor Role |
Role Definition |
---|---|
Conceptualization | Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims. |
Data Curation | Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later reuse. |
Formal Analysis | Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data. |
Funding Acquisition | Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication. |
Investigation | Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection. |
Methodology | Development or design of methodology; creation of models. |
Project Administration | Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution. |
Resources | Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools. |
Software | Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components. |
Supervision | Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team. |
Validation | Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs. |
Visualization | Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation. |
Writing – Original Draft Preparation | Creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation). |
Writing – Review & Editing | Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages. |
Take clear, accurate notes about where you find specific ideas. One tool that can help with this is Sciwheel, which enables you to annotate documents. Another useful tool is an evidence analysis log (see below) that can provide a quick overview and comparison of the different sources you reviewed.
When you are ready to paraphrase, carefully consider the words you choose. This is important for both avoiding plagiarism and accurately reflecting the authors' work. The below video briefly covers suggestions for conveying what an author did, said, or their opinion. It also demonstrates the evidence analysis log.
Each citation style has rules for formatting in-text citations, which are needed whenever you refer to information found in another source.
See our AMA 11 Citation Guide for information on how to format in-text citations.
The CHSU Health Sciences Library provides every faculty, staff, and student with a Sciwheel Premium account. Use Sciwheel to import articles and other resources as you locate them. Then annotate the documents and insert citations as you write.
The maximum average monthly high temperatures for Fresno, CA are January, 57 F; February, 63 F; March, 69 F; April, 76 F; May, 85 F; June, 93 F; July, 98 F; August, 98 F; September, 91 F; October, 80 F; November, 66 F; December, 57 F. The minimum average low temperatures are January, 40 F; February, 43 F; March, 47 F; April, 51 F; May, 57 F; June, 63 F; July, 68 F; August, 66 F; September, 62 F; October, 54 F; November, 45 F; December, 50 F.
Month | High Temp (F) | Low Temp (F) |
---|---|---|
January | 57 | 40 |
February | 63 | 43 |
March | 69 | 47 |
April | 76 | 51 |
May | 85 | 57 |
June | 93 | 63 |
July | 98 | 68 |
August | 98 | 66 |
September | 91 | 62 |
October | 80 | 54 |
November | 66 | 45 |
December | 57 | 50 |
Source: Carter M. Designing Science Presentations: A Visual Guide to Figures, Papers, Slides, Posters, and More. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2021.
Can you imagine trying to comprehend the Krebs Cycle in text alone?
Source: Andrew R Gross. Wikimedia Commons: CC-BY-SA. No changes were made.
While there are some situations where text recycling is an acceptable practice, it may not be so in other situations. Authors are urged to adhere to the spirit of ethical writing and avoid reusing their own previously published text, unless it is done in a manner that alerts readers about the reuse or one that is consistent with standard scholarly conventions (e.g., by using of quotations and proper paraphrasing).
This guideline is from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Research Integrity.
The following article also briefly discusses the concept of self-plagiarism.